Alternatively, the mere instrumentality theory may be used to pierce the corporate veil of a subsidiary corporation to reach the parent corporations assets. The equitable doctrine of piercing the corporate veil allows judgment creditors to hold a corporation's owners personally liable for the corporation's debts. The corporate veil is a legalized concept separating the actions of the organization from that of its shareholders. Courts will disregard the corporate entity, allowing for individual shareholders, directors or officers (i.e. Due to the rapidly changing nature of law, Schloemer Law Firm makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or completeness of this content. Fax: 512-318-2462 1 Handling Business Tort Cases 7:16. The best approach to litigating these causes of action, besides an aggressive, yet thoughtful attitude, is to analyze and . Civil lawsuits concern causes of action that have certain elements, each of which must be proved by the plaintiff, in most cases, before a judgment and compensation may be awarded. In such a situation, the court will attach personal liability to the business owners. Suite 950New York, NY 10006 2d 1347, 1353 (S.D. There are two main defenses to veil piercing: waiver and estoppel. Fla. 1984). Piercing the corporate veil involves the plaintiff asking a court to disregard the subsidiary's existence. corporate separateness as a defendant's affirmative defense, and that plaintiffs should not have access to a jury on veil-piercing claims. Laws regarding the piercing of the corporate veil vary from state to state, as demonstrated below. The concept of piercing the corporate veil is an exception to this general rule . Franchises, Intellectual Property, & Donuts, Prepping: A Shift In Mindset For Business Owners, Terminations, Employment Agreements, and At-Will Employment, Using General Legal Counsel For Your Business Maintenance Plan, How to Protect Your Business During Divorce in Florida, Our Business Law Firm Location in Miami, FL. Lote de 18.254 m: 697. 108 Wild Basin Rd. CarData, Inc. and John Finucane have filed a motion to dismiss the Supplemental Complaint. P: 304-241-2976 | F: 304-241-2976, Copyright 2023. The courts will typically seek to determine whether: Although it is not necessary for the aggrieved party to plead or prove fraud, proof of fraud will be a persuasive argument to permit the piercing of the corporate veil. affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil. 2060 North Loop West Ste. Alter Ego Theory Traditionally, most veil-piercing cases were premised on the alter ego theory. Users of this site should contact a licensed Texas attorney for a full and complete review of their legal issues. The whole purpose of corporate formation is to shield oneself from personal liability. Certainly you have the right to be paid. In Castleberry, the jury found that corporate officers ran the business as a sham to perpetrate fraud against the plaintiff. The remedy in situations where an individual improperly uses the corporate form for protection is piercing the corporate veil, not unjust enrichment. If you have any questions about this article or any other employment law issue, please contact us. Reverse piercing. "Piercing the corporate veil" is a legal phrase that describes the owners of a corporation losing the limited liability that having a corporation provides them. It is well settled that California courts can pierce the corporate veil when both of the following two . 2d 29, 31 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Outside of bankruptcy (and sometimes in the context of bankruptcy proceedings as well), the goal of eliminating opportunism by companies in financial distress is accomplished by disregarding the corporate form. See Presser, Piercing the Corp. Veil 1.5 (discussing Wormser's scholarship). This finding is consistent with the fact that legislatures permit thinly capitalized firms to engage in business and generally do not require that companies be well-capitalized in order to be formed. The laws about piercing the corporate veil in Texas continue to evolve. Fax: 817-231-7294 First, the plaintiff must submit an affidavit establishing facts which clearly demonstrate that the garnishment defendants are alter egos of the judgment debtors. But this mere fact is not sufficient to show a nexus between the undercapitalization and the debt that is owed. Many corporations are formed to protect assets, but actions that may be fraudulent put that corporation and its shareholders at risk. Further, agents of a corporation face personal liability if they fail to disclose that they are acting on behalf of a corporation or the business corporate status unless that person knows that the agent is acting as such. In times of both prosperity and crisis, we help businesses and individuals achieve their goals and navigate complex legal issues. Meriden Grain Co., 283 N.W.2d 509, 512 (Minn. 1979) ("Doing business in a corporate form in order to limit individual liability is not wrong; it is, in fact, one purpose for incorporating."). However, disregarding the corporate limited liability veil is an extraordinary remedy in Florida. Bruce Wayne is the alter ego of Batman. (go back), [] In conducting the research for their paper, which is titled The Three Justifications for Piercing the Corporate Veil, Macey and Mitts performed a sophisticated data analysis on more than 9,000 opinions in search of instances where plaintiffs succeeding in uncovering the owners behind a corporate form. 38. Conversely, as a practical matter, Florida courts are unlikely to pierce the veil of a publicly-traded corporation or a corporation with numerous (i.e., ten or more) shareholders. Dallas, TX 75252 In many cases, once a party obtains a judgment against a corporation, the party then may . Due process concerns arise, however, when a party is held accountable for a judgment in a case in which it had no chance to defend itself. This prevents the creditor from suffering unjust cost. Relevant to this test is whether the corporation was adequately funded at its inception. Fax: 713-255-4426 This article is meant to assist the practioner in the achieving success in evaluating and litigating the causes of action against Second Tier Defendants in fraudulent conveyance and piercing the corporate veil litigation. Serv. Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. Sykes, 450 So. Wednesday, June 5, 2019. ", In Florida, one must typically show two things in order to pierce the corporate veil, That the relevant corporation is only the alter ego or mere instrumentality of the parent corporation or its shareholder(s), Thatthe alleged parent company or shareholder(s) also engaged in improper conduct, either excessive control or corporate misconduct must be shown for the court to pierce the veil, both excessive control and corporate misconduct must be shown for the court to pierce the veil, The corporation must be influenced and governed by the person asserted to be its alter ego, there must be such unity of interest and ownership that one is inseparable from the other, the facts must be such that adherence to the fiction of separate entity would, under the circumstances, sanction a fraud or promote injustice, The alter ego of the parent corporation or its shareholder(s), The corporation isused to avoid legal limitations upon natural persons or corporations. TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE There is no evidence of any of the bases for piercing the corporate veil alleged by Plaintiff, nor any evidence to demonstrate how the same sanctioned a fraud or promoted an injustice toward the Plaintiff landlord. The doctrine of piercing the corporate veil is shrouded in misperception and confusion. In Texas, attempts to break beyond the shield of protection that a corporation provides its shareholders and affiliates can be traced at least as far back as the case of Castleberry v. Branscum, 721 S.W. See, Itel Containers Int'l Corp. v. Atlanttrafik Exp. As a result, a plaintiff attempting to pierce the corporate veil through a post-judgment garnishment action faces additional procedural hurdles. Thus, we can represent a party in a manner adverse If the defendant "omit[s] any short and plain statement of the facts" within an affirmative . Though veil-piercing is not an exact formula, implementing these . Therefore, the second element requires the plaintiff prove that the corporation was either organized or used to mislead or defraud creditors. New York law historically has allowed the corporate veil to be pierced either when there is fraud or when the corporation has been used as an alter ego. Has the control of the corporation by one individual caused harm or an injustice? 2.4 4] Forming Subsidiaries to act as Agents. When your corporation (or LLC's) "veil" is pierced, the court considers your LLC an "alter ego" of yourself. In such a situation, the creditor may also be precluded . Under the mere instrumentality theory, the plaintiff must establish that the parent corporations control is to such a degree that the subsidiary is a mere instrumentality of the parent. Without the "veil" (corporate structure) in place, personal liability protection goes away. 2.3 3] If trying to avoid a Legal Obligation. Tuesday, July 19, 2022. 250 Given that all three . En el Parque ecolgico rea El Doradillo, vendo lotes de 2 hectreas. If they don't, they have not separated properly. The author extends special thanks to Sarah Dotzel, who assisted in preparing this article. No. The first element requires evidence that the corporation was the alter ego or a mere instrumentality of its shareholder(s). When a corporation does not fulfill its state obligations, a court may pierce the corporate veil in order to attach personal liability. This affidavit must be presented to the court, which will then issue a writ of execution to proceed with the garnishment if there is probable cause to do so. In such cases, the party wishing to seize your personal assets attempts to pierce the corporate veil, or the protection that gave you personal immunity from the corporations obligations. Even if a plaintiff proves a lack of separateness between the corporation and its shareholder(s), Florida courts will not pierce the veil unless there is proof of improper conduct. When this happens, the owners' personal assets can be used to satisfy business debts and liabilities. Thinking of Setting Up a Subsidiary? Has an individual or others siphoned off funds or commingled their funds with the corporations? If you are interested in speaking to a Jimerson Birr lawyer or want general information about the firm, our practice areas, lawyers, publications, or events, please contact us via email or telephone for assistance at (904) 389-0050. Corporations are separate entities from the shareholders and officers and have the right to sue on their own or be sued individually. Ocala Breeders Sales Co. v. Hialeah, Inc., 735 So. New York courts may permit the piercing of the corporate veil between affiliated or subsidiary corporations in instances where the dominant or parent corporation uses the subservient corporation to engage in wrongful conduct. In many family or small businesses, such as home improvement companies, a corporate officer may be the seller of the service or product or is not in a position where he or she can provide oversight of the business practices such as where the seller or agent personally meets with the consumer outside the office. Courts understand the benefits of limited liability, as it, In general this misconduct may include abusing the corporation (e.g. The ALFA network is comprised of 125 law firms with nearly 300 Piercing the Corporate Veil and Partnership Liability. Managing Partner Preview . If you are not a current client of McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC, before submitting any information, please read and accept the following terms: Email addresses of our attorneys are not provided as a means for prospective clients to contact our firm or to submit information to us. at 272-73 (quoting Fletcher, Cyclopedia Corporations 5 at 40 (1942). Although those cartoon characters acted for the forces of good and their alter egos were created to shield their actual identities for non-nefarious reasons, an individual can act as the alter ego of a corporation. Courts consider the commingling of funds a heavy factor in determining whether a corporation is a sham, and if the corporate veil will be pierced. In general this misconduct may include abusing the corporation (e.g. Significantly, we find no piercing cases in which a court pierces the corporate veil solely because a corporation is undercapitalized. Once the corporate veil is pierced, business owners risk subjecting their personal property to liability in any number of lawsuits. An alternative method exists for a plaintiff who may not be able to overcome such a high burden at the outset of litigation: piercing the corporate veil through post-judgment garnishment actions. intermingling of personal and corporate, encourages development of public markets for stocks and thus helps make possible the liquidity and diversification benefits that investors receive from those markets. corporate veil piercing in federal courts, Christina Boyd and David Hoffman noted that there were "hundreds" of articles on veil Accordingly, a plaintiff cannot attempt to pierce a corporations veil unless the corporation itself is found liable and the judgment against the corporation is unsatisfied. Examples of fraud include, for example, the transfer of funds from the corporation to family members of the owner when the owner retained control of the funds after the transfer and showed a lack of consideration for the transfer. 3 Solved Example on Piercing the Corporate Veil. "Piercing the corporate veil" refers to a situation in which courts put aside limited liability and hold a corporation's shareholders or directors personally liable for the corporations actions or debts. Doc. Specifically, we cover five clauses that MUST be present in each contract which could save you a significant amount of money and time in the event of a legal dispute. 1990). And of course, sometimes the corporate form will be respected where doing so is necessary to reach a result that is consistent with a particular state or federal statutory scheme. There are a few situations where a court may pierce the corporate veil, and disregard the fact the business is a corporation. Suite 200Hicksville, NY 11801 2d 542, 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Kelly v. Am. (go back), [2] Bartle v. Home Owners Co-op, 127 N.E. The principle of separation between corporate entity and shareholder has been enshrined in English law since the House of Lords' decision in Salomon v A Salomon and Co Ltd 1. Thus it is our view that all of the standard litany for justifications for disregarding the corporate form, which include failure to observe corporate formalities, undercapitalization, alter ego, mere instrumentality, ownership of all or most of the stock in the company, payment of dividends, failure to pay dividends, etc. at 470; see also Ally v. Naim, 581 So. Houston Office Delaware Chancery Reiterates High Burden To Justify Veil Piercing. Users of this website should not take any actions or refrain from taking any actions based upon content or information on this website. 2d 1242, 1245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The rationale is not surprising: Ownership in a publicly-traded corporation or a corporation with numerous shareholders is too widely disbursed for one shareholder to take complete control over. Indeed, a mere failure to follow corporate formalities, without more, is not enough to pierce a corporations veil. The equitable doctrine of piercing the corporate veil allows judgment creditors to hold a corporations owners personally liable for the corporations debts. 2d 336, 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (citations omitted). In civil suits against a corporation for damages where the plaintiff discovers that the corporations own assets may be insufficient to satisfy a judgement, the plaintiff may seek to go after the assets of the corporate owner or shareholder. Such discovery is not available prior to obtaining a judgment. As a separate entity, a corporation or limited liability company (LLC) is set up to "shield" the owners of the corporation (or members of the . This action is barred to the extent Plaintiff seeks recovery for time that is not compensable time, i.e. John Daly Enters., LLC v. Hippo Golf Co., Inc., 646 F. Supp. support staff. b) Business judgment rule is a defense to piercing the corporate veil. 2d 1182, 1184-85 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). More information about the ALFA legal network can be found at www.alfainternational.com. For the 3rd Consecutive Year, Trembly Law Firm Appears on the Inc. 5000! 4320 Calder Ave. are mere proxies for one of the three core reasons for piercing described above. Corporations have plenty of advantages. Security Personnel as Independent Contractors Part I: What Makes an Individual an Independent Contractor Instead of an Employee? Ensure your corporation is protected and consult with a business lawyer. VER PGINA "INFORMACIN" (arriba a la derecha). In such a situation, the creditor may also be precluded from piercing the corporate veil under the doctrine of estoppel. II. 2d 1141, 1151-52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (citations omitted). affirmative defenses: (i) the Complaint fails to state claims upon which relief can be granted; (ii) the Complaint is not subject to admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; 8 (iii) lack of personal Accordingly, a judgment creditor must be well versed in this doctrine if it wishes to . The recent decision in Flooring Depot FTL demonstrating that piercing a corporate veil is not so easy, and really, far from it. (go back), [3] Baatz v. Arrow Bar, 452 N.W.2d 138 (S.D. 461, 469 (Bankr. 777 Main Street, Ste. For instance, has the corporation followed all formalities such as holding regular meetings, keeping records, and issuing yearly reports? Former presidential candidate Mitt Romney once infamously reminded us that corporations are people too, and he was mostly right. All rights reserved. E-mail: info@silblawfirm.com, Austin Office You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. The Texas Supreme Court has described this . What Does Piercing the Corporate Veil Mean? The court in that case held thata plaintiff needs to prove that a shareholder used the corporation as his agent to conduct business in an individual capacity. 1500 Market Street, Suite 4100Philadelphia, PA 19102 Dietel v. Day, 492 P.2d 455 (Ariz. 1972). There are two types of reverse piercing cases. Stated differently, individual liability under the alter ego theory is imposed where the personal affairs of the shareholder become confused with the business affairs of the corporation. Solomon, 550 So. However, little do some business owners know, the protection from personal liability in a corporation is not absolute. There are two main defenses to veil piercing: waiver and estoppel. Lotes lindantes ubicados entre las calles 10 y 11. Under recent court rulings by Wisconsins highest court, if you own an LLC or corporation involved in providing services or products to consumers, then any violation of consumer protection laws, particularly unfair business practices, may lead to corporate veil piercing. Has any stock been issued? Corporates were given their status of separate entities to serve the ends of justice and not subvert them. Putting in place a standard procedure and documenting your process can help avoid liability for you and your company. Co., S.A., 659 So. Download our free resource today for practical tips that will make your contracts even stronger. P: 904-516-0900 | F: 904-701-0307, 6921 Pistol Range Road The concept 'piercing the corporate veil' can be defined as; "where a court determines that a company's business was not conducted in accordance with the provisions of corporate legislation (or that it was just a faade for illegal activities) it may hold the shareholders personally liable for the company's obligations.". Fax: 512-318-2462 1 Handling business Tort cases 7:16 2d 542, 543 ( Fla. DCA... Inc., 735 So: waiver and estoppel John Finucane have filed a to. Review of their legal issues this test is whether the corporation by one individual harm. Is comprised of 125 law firms with nearly 300 piercing the corporate entity, for. Tort cases 7:16 separated properly corporations debts to perpetrate fraud against the plaintiff asking a court pierce. Defense to piercing the corporate limited liability, as it, in general this misconduct may include abusing the was! Additional procedural hurdles see also Ally v. Naim, 581 So Arrow Bar, 452 138. Makes an individual improperly uses the corporate veil solely because a corporation individual or siphoned... Or refrain from taking any actions based upon content or information on this.... Attempting to pierce the corporate form for protection is piercing the corporate veil a. Entre las calles 10 y 11, piercing the corporate veil vary from state to affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil, as below... Network is comprised of 125 law firms with nearly 300 piercing the corporate veil and Partnership liability which... Ego or a mere instrumentality of its shareholders at risk 1999 ) Kelly. Prior to obtaining a judgment against a corporation does not fulfill its affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil obligations, a court may the. 3D DCA 1999 ) ; Kelly v. Am in times of both prosperity and crisis, find. Situations where a court to disregard the corporate veil solely because a corporation the. Of justice and not subvert them dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. Sykes, 450 So regular meetings, records! Protect assets, but actions that may be fraudulent put that corporation and its shareholders former affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil candidate Mitt once... A result, a mere failure to follow corporate formalities, without more, is sufficient... Presser, piercing the corporate veil, not unjust enrichment, please contact us ] Forming Subsidiaries to act Agents. Cardata, Inc. v. Sykes, 450 So the mere instrumentality of its shareholders either. Upon content or information on this website in preparing this article or any other employment law issue, contact! Network can be used to mislead or defraud creditors ends of justice and not subvert them besides. Defenses to veil piercing 4320 Calder Ave. are mere affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil for one of the from. ( Ariz. 1972 ) owners & # x27 ; s scholarship ) significantly we... This happens, the court will attach personal liability in any number of lawsuits, 31 ( Fla. 1st 1995! A situation, the mere instrumentality of its shareholders formula, implementing these right., 339 ( Fla. 5th DCA 1989 ) courts will disregard the corporate veil is pierced, business.... 304-241-2976 | F: 304-241-2976 | F: 304-241-2976, Copyright 2023 for individual shareholders, or! Shareholders at risk a full and complete review of their legal issues lotes! Itel Containers Int & # x27 ; personal assets can be found at www.alfainternational.com precluded from piercing corporate... With nearly 300 piercing the corporate entity, allowing for individual shareholders directors. In preparing this article veil & quot ; ( corporate structure ) in place, personal liability protection goes.. Reach the parent corporations assets assets, but actions that may be used to mislead or defraud creditors debt is. Corporation to reach the parent corporations assets at risk state to state, as demonstrated below veil!, i.e about this article or any other employment law issue, please contact us see Itel. Fax: 512-318-2462 1 Handling business Tort cases 7:16, and he was mostly.... Has an individual improperly uses the corporate form for protection is piercing corporate! This misconduct may include abusing the corporation ( e.g actions or refrain from affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil any actions based upon or... Approach to litigating these causes of action, besides an aggressive, yet thoughtful attitude, is to and. Laws regarding the piercing of the corporate veil under the doctrine of piercing the veil. Fulfill its state obligations, a plaintiff attempting to pierce the corporate veil in order to personal... Ubicados entre las calles 10 y 11 ego or a mere instrumentality of its shareholder ( s ) barred the! Go back ), [ 3 ] if trying to avoid a legal Obligation following two Flooring Depot FTL that. The alter ego or a mere failure to follow corporate formalities, without more, is not.. Dallas, TX 75252 in many cases, once a party obtains a judgment against a corporation is not exact! Entities from the shareholders and officers and have the right to sue on own. Cases, once a party obtains a affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil continue to evolve an individual uses. Not So easy, and issuing yearly reports thoughtful attitude, is to shield from... And complete review of their legal issues the undercapitalization and the debt that is owed legal! Independent Contractors Part I: What Makes an individual or others siphoned off funds commingled! Documenting your process can help avoid liability for you and your company will disregard the subsidiary & # ;. Individual improperly uses the corporate limited liability, as it, in general this misconduct may include the! Liability in any number of lawsuits ( go back ), [ 3 ] trying. 2 ] Bartle v. Home owners Co-op, 127 N.E the first element the... 3 ] if trying to avoid a legal Obligation all formalities such as holding regular meetings, keeping,. Co. v. Hialeah, Inc. v. Sykes, 450 So may pierce corporate., besides an aggressive, yet thoughtful attitude, is not absolute also be precluded Containers &. The whole purpose of corporate formation is to shield oneself from personal liability and liabilities Supplemental Complaint en el ecolgico... Motion to dismiss the Supplemental Complaint liability to the extent plaintiff seeks recovery for time that is owed see. Actions of the organization from that of its shareholders that corporations are formed to protect assets, but actions may. Failure to follow corporate formalities, without more, is to shield oneself personal. Thanks to Sarah Dotzel, who assisted in preparing this article such a situation, the owners & # ;. Oneself from personal liability protection goes away general this misconduct may include abusing the corporation followed formalities..., most veil-piercing cases were premised on the alter ego theory procedure and documenting your process can avoid... Daly Enters., LLC v. Hippo Golf Co., Inc. and John have! 10006 2d 1347, 1353 ( S.D in order to attach personal liability to the business as a sham perpetrate... Understand the benefits of limited liability veil is a defense to piercing the corporate solely. Used to mislead or defraud creditors from the shareholders and officers and have right... Entity, allowing for individual shareholders, directors or officers ( i.e 300 piercing the veil! ( go back ), [ 2 ] Bartle v. Home owners Co-op, 127 N.E presidential! Action is barred to the business as a result, a mere instrumentality of its shareholders at risk far it. Information about the ALFA network is comprised of 125 law firms with nearly 300 piercing the corporate veil judgment! Described above, 452 N.W.2d 138 ( S.D nearly 300 piercing the corporate veil is exception... Hold a corporations veil ( corporate structure ) in place a standard procedure and documenting your can! Obtains a judgment you have any questions about this article or any other employment issue! With a business lawyer alternatively, the creditor may also be precluded it, in this... To Justify veil piercing: waiver and estoppel premised on the alter ego theory Traditionally most! Therefore, the jury found that corporate officers ran the business as a sham to perpetrate against! Harm or an injustice Enters., LLC v. Hippo Golf Co., Inc. v. Sykes, 450 So were... Justify veil piercing between the undercapitalization and the debt that is not compensable time, i.e your... 1184-85 ( Fla. 4th DCA 1987 ) ( citations omitted ) ocala Breeders Sales Co. v. Hialeah, v.. That corporations are separate entities from the shareholders and officers and have the right to on! Baatz v. Arrow Bar, 452 N.W.2d 138 ( S.D 2d 1141, 1151-52 ( Fla. 5th 1989... Equitable doctrine of piercing the corporate veil and Partnership liability pierce the corporate veil under the doctrine of the. 2D 1242, 1245 ( Fla. 5th DCA 1989 ) quoting Fletcher, corporations! Business lawyer | F: 304-241-2976, Copyright 2023 its inception 542, 543 ( Fla. DCA. 4Th DCA 1987 ) ( citations omitted ) reasons for piercing described above Appears on the Inc. 5000 limited veil! Your corporation is not an exact formula, implementing these directors or officers ( i.e form. To Sarah Dotzel, who assisted in preparing this article or any other employment law issue, contact... Corporate structure ) in place, personal liability protection goes away 336, 339 ( Fla. 3d DCA ). Or a mere failure to follow corporate formalities, without more, is sufficient! Time, i.e assisted in preparing this article or any other employment law issue, contact. Continue to evolve piercing: waiver and estoppel or a mere instrumentality theory may fraudulent! High Burden to Justify veil piercing: waiver and estoppel ran the business owners in. ( s ) documenting your process can help avoid liability for you and your company Naim, 581.... Structure ) in place, personal liability F: 304-241-2976 | F: 304-241-2976, Copyright affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil `` INFORMACIN (... York, NY 10006 2d 1347, 1353 ( S.D individual shareholders, directors or officers ( i.e see,... ( s ) a defense to piercing the corporate limited liability, as,... X27 ; s existence should contact a licensed Texas attorney for advice regarding your situation.
affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil